Skip to content
The Daily TeabagThe Daily Teabag

Topic hub

Online speech & platform duty

Statutes and enforcement first — Canada’s Online Harms / Safe Social Media successors, the UK Online Safety Act, the EU DSA, platform hate codes, and where journalist accreditation fights sit beside content-regulation law.

Also browse related tags: #online-harms, #Online-Safety-Act, #DSA, #platform-regulation, #hate-speech, #Digital-Safety-Act

Featured on this hub

Florida State Capitol, Tallahassee — illustrative for the Eleventh Circuit (covers Florida, Georgia and Alabama); not the Atlanta federal courthouse — Photo: public domain / site archive

Accountability|United States

11th Circuit vacates injunction blocking Georgia’s social-media age-verification law

In NetChoice v. Attorney General of Georgia (No. 25-12436, filed 15 October 2026), a three-judge panel held that NetChoice failed its facial First Amendment burden under Moody, and failed on vagueness and § 230 preemption. The panel vacated the Northern District of Georgia’s preliminary injunction against SB 351 and remanded. The law’s age checks, parental consent under 16, and minor-ad targeting limits can be enforced while the case continues.

Daily Teabag Desk·Centre
Palace of Westminster, London — Photo: Diliff, CC BY-SA 2.5

Accountability|European Union

Meta takes Ofcom’s Category 1 Instagram/WhatsApp labels to the Upper Tribunal

In mid-September 2026 Meta served an appeal against Ofcom’s Category 1 designation of Instagram and WhatsApp under the UK Online Safety Act — joining a wave of platform challenges Ofcom told Lords peers it faces in a “highly litigious environment.”

Daily Teabag Desk·Slight right

More coverage

California State Capitol, Sacramento — Photo: Alex Proimos, CC BY 2.0

Accountability|United States

Encinitas settles: $175,000 and parental notice after gender-identity buddy lesson

A Southern District of California order dated 14 September 2026 approved a $175,000 settlement in S.E. v. Grey, vacated the May 2025 preliminary injunction, and dismissed the case with prejudice — after Encinitas Union School District had already rewritten notice-and-opt-out rules in the shadow of Mahmoud v. Taylor.

Daily Teabag Desk·Slight right
California State Capitol, Sacramento — Photo: Alex Proimos, CC BY 2.0

Accountability|United States

The “Stop Nick Shirley Act” heads to federal court

California’s new immigration-worker privacy law was written after a viral fraud hunter showed up. FIRE warned it chills speech. Shirley’s lawyers say that’s the point.

James Ortega·Lean right